posted on January 31, 2021 06:20 PM by
u/stairway-to-kevin
77
u/solastsummer92 pointsat 1612124359.000000
His follow up tweet:
“but Jon, is has a pic of a dog!” doesn’t mean anything. Lots of
shampoos i used in the past have pictures of waterfalls, or people
cleaning dishes, or gauzily drawn women frolicking in pastures, or dudes
under waterfalls with chests provocatively projected outwards, or
whatever
I cannot stress enough that the shampoo with people cleaning dishes
on it is not shampoo either
> "but Jon, is has a pic of a dog!"
>
> doesn't mean anything. Lots of shampoos i used in the past have pictures of waterfalls, or **people cleaning dishes**, or gauzily drawn women frolicking in pastures, or dudes under waterfalls with chests provocatively projected outwards, or whatever
does... he also use dish soap for Shampoo?
I guess the autist super-race has trouble with dog faces too?
EDIT2: I apologize, the comment was poor judgement on my part. I
didn’t mean to offend anyone. Maybe a better alternative would have been
something like “they want to become AIs so badly they’re now starting to
fail visual object recognition of pets.” Or maybe I’ll stick to “the
jerk store called and they’re running out of you” from now on. Mea
culpa.
EDIT: I was being sarcastic guys. Is there a freaking list of rules
of acceptable sneer etiquette? On second thought, this sneering has run
its course for me, I was attracted to it because I, like you all I’m
sure, wanted an outlet to ridicule the seemingly unchallenged crap
spewed out of the rationalist circles, but I’d rather spend my time in
constructing a better alternative.
Should it not have been implied within the context of this sub? Ok, whatever, I'm leaving it up for future reference so others don't make this same mistake. This is the second time I make a faux pas on this sub, there won't be a third. I guess sneering isn't my thing, I either try to be too serious and offer constructive criticism, which then gets ridiculed, or else I go too far, apparently, and offend people (unintentionally, I swear). Back to lurking as a spectator for me.
I missed that whole discussion. I can see your point, mea culpa. I should have realized that this is still a public forum and care for others’ feelings should trump any attempted risqué witticisms.
Have you tried just not repeating bigoted language, ironically or otherwise? Christ, don't get pissy cause you got a whooping 3 downvotes, just don't repeat bigotry. It's not that hard.
His follow up tweet:
I cannot stress enough that the shampoo with people cleaning dishes on it is not shampoo either
Reply down thread:
I know this is off topic but mods please don’t delete this it’s so funny
Measured every skull except the one that matters most
Did the picture of the dog on the bottle not tip him off? What did he think, that it was dog-scented shampoo?
lol
This explains things.
But clearly this is a 4d chess move to throw racismdog off the scent.
https://twitter.com/supermathskid/status/1355943837101907971
I think he is lying too. There is more likely machinery or flames or trees on ‘male’ shampoo bottles than fucking pets.
I guess the autist super-race has trouble with dog faces too?
EDIT2: I apologize, the comment was poor judgement on my part. I didn’t mean to offend anyone. Maybe a better alternative would have been something like “they want to become AIs so badly they’re now starting to fail visual object recognition of pets.” Or maybe I’ll stick to “the jerk store called and they’re running out of you” from now on. Mea culpa.
EDIT: I was being sarcastic guys. Is there a freaking list of rules of acceptable sneer etiquette? On second thought, this sneering has run its course for me, I was attracted to it because I, like you all I’m sure, wanted an outlet to ridicule the seemingly unchallenged crap spewed out of the rationalist circles, but I’d rather spend my time in constructing a better alternative.